A great journey

The ones that follow my blog know that I am a huge fan of JD Meir’s work.

Well, today he is interviewed online and tell the story of his own journey and how and why he is doing what he is doing.  A Very interesting read.

Evolving Being in Action: J.D. Meier – Evolving Beings | Consciousness Expansion and Heart-Centered Living.

Reading and chatting with J.D. I learned a lot of things. But I believe that the most important one is about the “Journey vs. destination” life paradigm. What JD taught me is that:

  • Life is made of many journeys and many destinations and they should be as various as possible to
    maximize growth, fun and impact
  • Both journey AND destination are important. It’s not an ”or” choice some people want to make, but
    definitely an “and” one
  • Picking the right ones and then dedicating yourself fully to them is the secret of (almost) all (happiness, success, growth, fulfillment… you name it)

So, what are you next journeys?

If you always wonder what embedded device were…

If you always wondered what embedded devices were this is a great video our team just released that shows it very simply: http://youtu.be/zpwANN22lNY

How cool is this: Gamers to help with AIDS research

How cool is this: AIDS researchers using online gamers skills to solve a protein folding problem: http://bit.ly/nXW1RE

62MPG diesel hybrid

62MPG hybrid on a cross-over vehicle? That’s possible with Peugeot’s new 2008 hybrid diesel. Unfortunately they don’t sell in the US. http://htxt.it/QNk6

This is why software

This is why software and high-tech in general always amazez me: how 1+1+1 can make 4,5 or more! http://htxt.it/mdc6

The kind of innovatiions we need to see more in cleantech

The kind of innovations we need to see more in clean tech. More than 2x power with a little piece of metal. Just smart. http://htxt.it/qik6

Good enough or perfect: always a tough choice

One thing always really hard to come to a definitive conclusion on is where to stop when working on a deliverable. How to strike the right balance between “ good enough”  and “perfection”. This is a question that is true in marketing, in engineering and probably in most things in life.

Depending on our own personality, our default modus operandi may be one or the other. “Good enough” people can also be referred to as having a 80-20 or Pareto-like approaches to fixing problems. “Perfectionists” will often be labeled as detail oriented.

However, very often, people from one type won’t appreciate the other’s perspective.  A perfectionist will easily be tagged as “anal retentive”, and, conversely,  80-20 people will just as easily being judged as “doing a sloppy job”.

After having dealt with this conundrum for many years I came to a few conclusions:

  1. Don’t believe any guru, expert, business leader, etc. that tells you the secret of success is one of the other. The real good answer is: it depends. A lot.
  2. We’re all wired differently so it’s crucial that you know what your default style is (good enough vs. perfectionist) in order for you to account for this preference when having to make a decision.
  3. With every task, you should start by asking yourself: what is the minimum quality bar I need to achieve? (note: I am purposely getting out of the perfectionist/80-20 wording here, or as the authors of Crucial Conversations would say, I’m avoiding the “sucker’s choice”) This is the key question because, depending on the task, the bar can be widely different.

For instance, and this is timely as Steve jobs announced his departure as the CEO of Apple this week, in this article on J.D. Meir’s blog, Jay Elliot (a former Apple VP), explains that Jobs’ obsession with details and perfection is what made Apple successful. And I believe it’s true. Likewise, in product like planes, spaceships, Lasik… it’s obviously critical to get to 99.999% not to good enough (or to think the Pareto way: 80.20).

On the flip side, if you are trying to reach perfection while weeding your backyard, de-fatting a piece of meat for your next meal, finding the perfect font or clipart for an internal PowerPoint presentation, try to test every single possible scenario for a new software, ship a totally bug-free product, write the perfect status report email, etc. you will spend 10x (at least!) more time finishing your task than with a “good enough” approach and this will produce an improved result that virtually no one but yourself will be able to see.

So, next time you need to build this PowerPoint presentation, test this product, decide on your which hotel to stay at or simply map your next road-trip start by asking yourself 2 simple questions:

  1. What is the quality bar I really need for this task?
  2. …Then tweak it a bit depending on whether you are a perfectionist (lower the bar a tidbit), or a Pareto fan (maybe aim for a slightly higher quality outcome).

The bummer with that topic is that I now wonder whether this post is good enough. Darn! Smile

Landing from the cloud is not that straight forward

This week while at Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference I had a very interesting discussion with a cool French start-up offering a cloud-based solution.

As we were discussing about the great elasticity that the cloud provides, it dawned on me that there was another part of the business scaling equation that I never hear that much about when it comes to cloud-based businesses: the front-end sales and marketing side or, to rephrase, the actual business landing from a cloud-based solution.

At a conceptual level, the 3 core elements of any end-to-end business that is developing and selling products (using “product” in the broader sense of the term here: services, solutions, technology plug-ins…) will always have are:

1) Product development

2) Manufacturing

3) Sales and marketing

In a cloud based business model, product development will leverage scalable assets, tools and pre-build components to help accelerate it.

From the “manufacturing” standpoint (which also includes installation, logistics..), the cloud is an amazing asset as it allows start-up (and any size corporation for that matter) to deliver their product from quantity 1 to as large as necessary in a matter of hours. This is the great promise of cloud-based computing.

What about Sales and Marketing then?

As we were discussing it became clear that this company’s challenge was not the product (they were already done developing their v1), the manufacturing (they were very pleased with the scale Windows Azure was providing them) but the sales and marketing side. Being based in France, how to immediately get a sales and marketing scale equivalent to a US company, i.e. to reach not one country but all top-tier markets from the get go, was not an easy problem to solve.

Or course the “world is flat”, to quote Tom Friedman, and it’s easier than ever to reach-out to the other side of the world, leverage social networks, industry groups or partner programs to find local partners you can associate with. Still, developing the right business model to go through these distributors, finding the right ones (size, coverage areas, services, vested interest in your business success vs. adding one more product to a 100-items product line…), and setting up an infrastructure to deal with and manage daily 5, 10, 50 distributors or value added resellers is not quick, simple or risk free.

So, what would be the initial conclusions from this situation?

1) We should not be surprised to see cloud-based technology companies, in particular start-up, to initially have what it could look like a fairly heavy sales and marketing organization for a high-tech business (i.e. vs. the development team size) as this will be needed to quickly scale out at the sales and marketing level.

2) If you are looking to invest in such a company and there is not real “business landing” talent in the management team, i.e. people that understand that landing this business with customers globally will not happen on its own, this should raise a red flag.

3) The cloud allowing anyone to scale extremely rapidly, there is a good chance that in certain (many? most?) situations what will separate winners from losers will not be the detailed features and functionalities but the ability to scale their sales and marketing landing capabilities. Quickly.

Why Some People Have All the Luck – Anthony Tjan – Harvard Business Review

Why Some People Have All the Luck – Anthony Tjan – Harvard Business Review.

As the saying goes: There is no such thing as luck.

Luck is nothing more than:

  1. Humility: know that you don’t know everything
  2. Intellectual curiosity: desire to learn, listen explore
  3. Optimism: ability to think positive even when things are not going exactly the way your thought they would.

This Space Intentionally Left White – Sabina Nawaz – Harvard Business Review

This Space Intentionally Left White – Sabina Nawaz – Harvard Business Review.

Great article from Savine Nawas on the importance to find time to think when you’ re a knowlege worker.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.